24 June 2012

Week 26: 'There's a place where space falls faster than light.'

Wonder spawned in: 2010
Wondered into being by: Andrew Hamilton.... the universe... God... I don't know.
Wonderspan: 6 min
To experience this wonder at its best: Click 'full screen' - there's no sound this time.

Hello, so what's a black hole?

If you’re not talking about the government’s finances, or indeed the nation’s finances or perhaps the entire global economic system founded on debt, or being stuck for an hour in a Xenakis concert, or the few moments’ silence after one of your dad’s jokes, or even simply a hole in the road after dark, then a black hole is a very large mass compressed into an infinitely small point of infinite density.  Just think of the full-stop at the end of this sentence, albeit vanishingly smaller, containing the mass of a few of our suns.

Wow.  Where can I get one?

Just wait for a large star to collapse and it’s yours, but I wouldn’t go near it if I were you.

Oh?

Well, pack a few suns into an infinitely small dot and it still has the gravity of a few suns.  That’s OK if you’re a few millions miles away but if you get close you’ll start to get sucked in.  As you get near you’ll turn into spaghetti; immense gravitational forces will compress you into the infinitesimal infinitely dense dot and there you’ll stay forever.

Far out, man.  So, stay back and watch, yeah?

Yes, and be seriously freaked out because it gets a lot weirder.  Around the tiny dot is a large black sphere of nothingness of a certain size – about 20 miles across would not be unusual.  In fact, this black sphere is not a sphere at all, it’s just a hole in your field of view – an absolute absence of any light at all, just blackness, so you can’t even see the tiny dot in the middle.

Woah...

Yes, woah.  And that’s because no light or anything else that gets anywhere near a black hole can escape from its gravitational pull, so there’s a big black... well... hole, where you just don’t see anything in space.

No way.

Way.  And freakier still: because gravity deforms space-time and the gravity near a black hole is extremely powerful, all the light travelling around the black hole (towards us from the other side, for example) gets skewed; it doesn’t travel in a straight line.  In fact it gets very curvy.  If we looked towards a black hole, the view of the universe around it would look as if we were gazing through a zoom lens of a camera with a black hole in the middle of it.  Here’s an artist’s impression of a black hole passing in front of a galaxy, for example: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d6/BlackHole_Lensing.gif

No, stop it.

I would, but it’s true.  And if that’s not weird and wonderful enough for you then get this: as anything approaches a black hole – a horse, say – it appears (from our safe distance) to slow down, turn redder and dimmer, and come to a stop as it takes an infinite time to reach it.

That’s insane.

But were we riding on the horse ourselves then time would not slow down in this way at all and we’d just get turned into spaghetti, as above.

Crikey.  Glue.

As far as the horse is concerned, yes.  It’s because the tiny dot’s gravity is playing havoc with time itself.

So let’s say we did want to get a bit nearer.  I’ll go first.

Take my horse, I’ll wait here,.  You’ll know something’s up when you feel intense tidal forces pulling you apart.  If you survive that, although you won’t, you’ll get some really crazy stuff to watch.

Like a light show.

Like an ever-darkening show.  First, you’ll reach a boundary quite a long way outside the black hole called the photon sphere.  At that point, everything will go dark in front and to the side of you; this is because all the light particles around you are getting pulled into the black hole before they can reach you.  So you won’t see any stars except for those behind you.  By this time you haven’t got a hope of ever coming back so you might as well enjoy the ride.

Next, you’ll reach the boundary of the black hole itself, called the event horizon.  I’ll be back here watching you turn red and take an infinite time to reach it but you’ll just zoom across it without even noticing it, hurtling towards nothing you can see until you – or what’s left of you – hit the infinitely small centre of the black hole.  But you’ll be dead spaghetti long before that.

Even so, you’ll add a little bit of mass to the black hole and if I’m still paying attention I’ll notice the black absence in front of me get a tiny bit bigger, although of course from my perspective, because of the effect of gravity on time, you still won’t have reached it yet.

So I just have to wait for a star to collapse to see all this?

If it’s a big enough star.  Our sun is not big enough.  You need something bigger – let’s say 20 times the mass of the sun – but there are plenty of those around.

Why’s that?

What an obliging questioner you are.

That’s because you’re me.

Sssh, don’t tell the others.  Well, it’s complicated but I am glad you asked.  During their working life, so to speak, stars are on fire and because of their heat their matter is expanded.  At the same time, all the particles of matter in the star exert a gravitational force on each other, which holds the gas together and stops its heat from blowing it all into space.  So, you end up with a big ball of fire held in a more-or-less steady state between the heat pushing everything out and the gravity pulling everything in.  But after a few hundred million years the star runs out of fuel and the fire starts to go out, so the star’s matter starts to collapse in on itself and then it’s showtime.

Great.

Hm, you’re mocking me now.  Exactly what kind of show depends on what the star is made of, how big it is, how much mass it has and so on.  As most stars run out of fuel and start to collapse under their own gravity, the rapidly increasing pressure releases a huge amount of energy.  A diesel engine works in the same way – when the cylinder compresses the air in the cylinder, it heats up and ignites the fuel.  But let's focus on stars for now.  So this energy reaches a critical point, at which the collapsing star suddenly explodes spectacularly outwards in a supernova that lasts a few weeks and emits more light in this time than our own sun can produce in its entire lifetime.  From a few thousand light years away it can look quite pretty, leaving behind a nebula and what appears to us like a new, very bright star in the night sky.  Here’s one that popped just last year: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/space/8748876/Massive-supernova-visible-from-Earth.html.

And that’s the end of that.  I’m pretty blown away myself.  Can I go now?

On the contrary.  Even though the supernova blasts most of the star’s matter away, about a quarter remains.  This matter is still subject to a large gravitational force and collapses still further, which causes more crazy stuff to happen.  The matter at the star’s core becomes denser and denser as its own gravity pulls it inwards.  If our star is a lucky one then the energy inside its atoms will eventually stop the matter from condensing.   In this case, it will become a neutron star, which is an extremely dense ball of matter.  In that case, our star, which started off with the mass of about 20 suns, would be about 36 miles across – that’s the mass of five suns crushed into a ball the size of London and spinning (in some cases) at up to a few hundred times a second.  Again – stay behind the yellow line.  In fact, it’s quite likely to be in a cluster of similar stars, which will be dancing around each other doing grand turns, swing outs and swing-your-partners, sometimes swapping companions to pick up others.

Dancing stars!

Behind the yellow line, please.  Yep, stars actually dancing.  Here’s an artist’s impression of two neutron stars spinning in decaying orbits until they collide with a very satisfying flash-bang-wollop at the end: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/44/Neutron_star_collision.ogv

OK, and if our star is unlucky…?

If our star doesn’t lose so much of its matter in the supernova – if it keeps, say, about 10 times its mass, then it will do something else.  Under the pressure of it own gravity, its atomic particles will collapse completely and, with nothing left to hold it up, it will collapse entirely to an infinitesimal point.  And there’s your black hole.

So that’s that.

Not so fast.  Did you know can build your own black hole as well.

Get off!

No, really.  All you need to do is gather a lot of stuff and put it in one place.

Like how much stuff?  Everything from the attic?

Yes, about that much, if you have junk up there with mass equivalent to a few billion suns.  Otherwise no.  But once you can build up that much stuff, the gravity-to-size ratio of your pile of stuff exceeds a certain point and an event horizon (the black absence in space) builds up around the huge object.  We have one of these supermassive black holes, as they’re called, at the centre of our galaxy.

Phew!

And then there are micro black holes, which spontaneously appear and disappear.  This is the sort of black hole they that the Large Hadron Collider could theoretically produce, but I wouldn’t worry too much about those because...

Time to introduce this Monday’s wonder, I think

Ah, yes.  So have a look at Andrew Hamilton’s simulation calculated using a supercomputer (and note his slightly manic look, as if he went into a black hole just last week and somehow escaped):
In the simulation you’re actually travelling in a decaying orbit around a black hole, like a fly in a whirlpool of water when you take the plug out of the bath.  As you approach, you can clearly see the photon sphere (where most of the strange lensing is happening) and the event horizon (the black absence).  The film ends at the point you reach the event horizon, which isn’t really a thing, it’s just the point at which no light can escape from the gravitational pull of the singularity.

Luckily, Andrew Hamilton has made a film of the inside, as well, complete with 'blinding flash of light'.  Keep your seatbelts fastened until we come to a complete stop:

Extra…

Video of from the exterior of the space shuttle  as it takes off, traverses the atmosphere and reaches space:
And finally... I should have said that last week's Imagining the Tenth Dimension video was suggested by bro Andy G - thanks Andy.
___________________
www.waysofloving.com

17 June 2012

Week 25: 'You discover things that seem impossible to be true, and then get to figure out why it's impossible for them not to be.'

Wonder spawned in: 2012
Wondered into being by: Vi Hart
Wonderspan: 6 min
To experience this wonder at its best: Click 'full screen', make sure you can hear the sound and get ready to think very quickly.

Today's wonder is nature's tendency to spiral into control, as presented by the doodling 'mathemusician' Vi Hart. 
Vi Hart, trained in music and maths, is now paid to doodle.

Thanks to Christopher A for suggesting today's wonder.

Extra:

The next parts of Vi Hart's trilogy on spirals:
'Every single flower or tree you see embodies wau.'  Here's Vi Hart introducing us to wau, a number pronounced as 'wow'.  Find out what 'e to the i to the e i o is e to the wau to the tau wau wau' actually means:
And if you're in the 0.1% or so of the population who finds Vi Hart's high-octane superdoodling reasonably easy to follow, can you keep up with this film as it whizzes you through all the dimensions of the universe?  How many dimensions can you twist your head around before it all stops making sense?  My frontal lobes melt after the first five, maybe the first four and a half.  First, 'we start with a point':
___________________
www.waysofloving.com

10 June 2012

Week 24: 'My life is filled with something beautiful.’

Wonder spawned in: 2011
Wondered into being by: Nizar Pasalic, with Abdullah and Sehaveta Kadenic
Wonderspan: 9 min
To experience this wonder at its best: Click 'full screen' and make sure you can hear the sound.

This week's wonder is love that lasts a lifetime - two lifetimes.  Nizar Pasalic introduces his short film:
 'After leaving their home in Bosnia because of the Yugoslavian war in the beginning of the 90's, Abdulah Kadenic and his wife Sehaveta ended up in Norway. They lived there for 12 years, until May 2007 where Sehavata had a series of strokes. She lost the ability to speak and the ability to move most of her body so she had to be put in a nursing home. Due to not understanding the language very well and because they never really felt at home in Norway they decided to move back to Bosnia.  Abdulah now lives in Sarajevo while Sehaveta stays at a nursing home 90 kilometers from there in the city of Travnik. Every week he visits her.'
___________________
www.waysofloving.com

3 June 2012

Week 23: 'They came from Nottingham'

Wonder spawned in: 1984
Wondered into being by: Jayne Torvill and Christopher Dean
Wonderspan: 6 min
To experience this wonder at its best: Click 'full screen' and make sure you can hear the sound.

Sarajevo - besieged in the war of the former Yugoslavia.  But before then it was famous for something else - hosting the Winter Olympics.  It's 1984.  Jayne Torvill and Christopher Dean are about to perform what is still regarded as the most accomplished ice dance ever - their Boléro routine.

Ravel's Boléro is 17 minutes long; an Olympic ice dance could be no more than four.  According to fellow British competitor Nicky Slater, Torvill and Dean had the piece abridged to just 4 minutes, 18 seconds, which was the minimum the arrangers could manage without butchering the music.  What to do with those illegal 18 seconds, then?  Well, the clock was only started once the dancers began to skate, so the pair began their dance by kneeling on the ice.

From this beginning, the energetic freedom and elegance of these two dancers is obvious.  Most ice dances are packed with flashy spins and jumps to impress the judges -- typically this forced showiness gets shoehorned into the routine with the rest of the dance reduced to a series of preludes to these peaks.  The Bolero routine breaks this rule; rather than dancy athletics, we are given an athletic dance.  The choreography so closely follows the music that it feels like the dance and the music belong to each other.  After just a few seconds, the audience is hooked.

Torvill and Dean may be dancing for the judges, but they seem to be dancing first for the music, as if they are right inside it.  As they follow Ravel's insistent repetitions, pulses and transitions, they seem so at ease with each other that we could forget they are skating at all -- their bodies appear to me like like two rivers converging and diverging through the space.  It is as if through touch alone, each knows the other completely.  At one point, with her back to her partner, Jayne Torvill dives forward and away from him, trusting entirely to his perfectly timed catch, which seems to come from nowhere and melts just as quickly into something else -- it looks as easy to them as walking.

I have taught dance and this mutual, bodily listening -- 'connection' as it's called in the jargon -- is the most difficult thing to convey.  Unless you know what to look for you can't point it out, nor can you explain it in abstract terms.  The only way to teach it is to get partnered dancers to close their eyes in turn.  They have to stop thinking, stop looking, and start feeling the connection that their bodies have with each other.  The only way I can try to describe it in words is that once you're connected you no longer feel separate; if you still feel separate, you haven't got it yet.  Once you do know what it is you can see connection in others and it looks completely different from dancers just going through the motions of a practised routine.

For their Boléro dance the judges gave Torvill and Dean 11 perfect 6.0 scores for artistic impression, guaranteeing them the gold medal.  The routine has since suffered, like anything else would, from being overplayed to the point of becoming a twee cliché in the national imagination.  But look beyond that and the 1984 performance still shines as an achingly beautiful, technically flawless dance.  It is as close as I’ve ever seen to two human beings flying with the same fearless ease of the birds.
Were they lovers?  They say they were not but how, then, could they dance as lovers would?  It is indeed a wonder!
____________________
www.waysofloving.com